the evidence is the more to be regretted, because, in one or two important respects, that obtained from the defendant's own witnesses, greatly corroborated the evidence given for the Crown. A perusal of Dr Legge's evidence, particularly that part of it (the concluding part) which, under a highly proper appreciation of the duty confessed by him to speak the truth, he volunteered to the Court and Jury, will satisfy His Excellency of the truth of the last observation. Not only was the credit of Lee Asow established most fully, and the unworthy aspersion on the capacity and honour of the young man Mr Dick, which Mr Day had so sedulously laboured to imprint, effectually removed, and the apparent contradiction between the Turnkey's statements to you and me, and his evidence in chief, satisfactorily explained and adjusted, - but a new and important confirmation of the evidence as to the principal matter of investigation, the question namely whether the liability of Mr Mitchell to the bookshop man had been present
10.
the evidence is the more to be
regretted,
because, in one or two
important respects, that obtained. from the
dant's own witnesses,
defenda
greatly
corroborated the evidence
7
given for the brown. A
2 perusal
of Dr Legges evidence
instance_
dence for ins
particularly that part of it,
art) which,
( the concluding part)
under a highly proper
appreciation of the duty confessed
reak the whole
by him to speate
"'" truth, he volunteered to the
bourt and Jury, will satisfy His Excellency of the truthe
last observation . Not only
the credit of
ཀ
Jury
VVAS
Lee Asow established
11
122
most fully
and the unworthy
ersion on the papacity aspersion
and
honour of the young man Mr Dick, had so seduloraly
which Mr. Day had so
labored to simprint, effectually
removed, and the apparent
contradiction between
You ayang
the Turnkey's statements to
to you.
and me, and his evidence in
chief, satisfactorily explained
ared
adjusted, - but
a new and
simportant confirmation was of the evidence as to the
obtained
principal matter
of investigation.
the question namely whether the liability of Mr. Mitchell to the bookshop man had been present
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.